https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6648
--- Comment #15 from Darxus <[email protected]> 2011-08-12 17:12:28 UTC --- Created attachment 4952 --> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4952 Add MTX.pm as sandbox-darxus.pm in rulesrc/sandbox/darxus/ I went with putting the loadplugin in the .cf because there isn't an example of a .pre working in the sandbox and I don't know of anything wrong with it. I think the scores are plenty conservative, and they have tflags net nopublish. I need somebody else to commit this since I don't have access. > > What percentage of legit emails were passing SPF and DKIM when rules for > > them > > were added? > > quite alot. There were milters and filters and it was a standard quite a while > before SA adopted it. So why did SA take so long to create the SPF and DKIM rules? > 90% of the SA setups are on auto-pilot (Think Cpanel/Plesk and all the other > millions of shared hosting shps using SA) > > Having it installed doesn't automatically mean anybody will understand it, > mantain it locally or even notice the value. Having it installed on more servers means there's more benefit to creating the records - more servers that will acknowledge your whitelisting. It's as much of a chicken and egg problem as SPF and DKIM and probably many other things. There's no point in creating the records until a bunch of people are using them. And there's no point in using the records until a bunch of people have created them. We can take a chunk out of that problem by enabling use of the records by a bunch of people (in SA), I believe without significant disadvantage. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
