https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6671
--- Comment #15 from Darxus <[email protected]> 2011-10-21 18:30:07 UTC --- We have bigger problems: Bringing back the bb corpora will not be sufficient to enable score generation / rule updates. As of the last net run, we have 38,740 fewer hams than required. Only hams no more than 2 months old are used. Of the missing bb corpora, number of hams in the last 3 months when last seen: bb-guenther_fraud 0 (all spam) bb-jhardin 471 bb-jhardin_fraud 0 (all spam) bb-jm 0 - most recent is 2010-11 So once we get bb corpora included again, we'll still be short at least 38,269 hams, having 74.5% of the required 150,000 no more than 2 months old. The reason I gave counts over the last three months is, for some reason, when the bb corpora were last included, ham counts were including ham back to around 2006: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20110820-r1159860-n/RCVD_IN_XBL/detail?s_corpus=1#corpus For example, it says there were 70,329 hams in bb-jm, and if you look at the yearly / monthly counts, that would need to include hams back to 2006. Counts in the latest net run make sense for only including the last 2 months of ham. This is particularly weird because even before the age threshold was changed for bug #6557 to match score generation, the threshold was still only 6 months. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
