https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6671
--- Comment #20 from Darxus <[email protected]> 2011-10-21 20:25:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > > Missing ham-net-bb-guenther_fraud > > Since this has been mentioned quite a few times: Please do note that this is a > hand classified corpus of *fraud* spam, intended for the SOUGHT_FRAUD > rule-set. > > Naturally, the mentioned ham counterpart to the fraud corpus does not exist, I realize that. The ruleqa page does actually say the ham corpus existed: ham-net-bb-guenther_fraud.20110820-r1159860-n.log: started: 20110820T090310Z; submitted: 20110820T090048Z; size: 4547 bytes It was there, although empty. It is now missing. What that indicates is that either the ham or spam part is missing, or both. I generally only include the ham part of the list of missing corpora from the output of my script to avoid redundancy. So when I say "ham-net-bb-guenther_fraud" is missing, what I mean is that some part of "bb-guenther_fraud" is missing. Sorry that bothers you. I could start stripping the ham-/spam- part off, but I'm afraid that could result in missing interesting output. (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > But I am a little concerned that near a quarter of the ham we've been using > > for > > ruleqa / score generation is about 3-4 years old, from jm. > > We will get more! Though I will state that we are mostly pretty good at How? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
