https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6501
Roman <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #9 from Roman <[email protected]> 2011-10-22 22:49:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Is there any rule in the email related RFCs that says, that there has to be > any > header information about authentication? > If yes, please tell me where. Yes, it's called RFC3848, which I learned about from this post http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/162165#162165 I believe the only MTA that doesn't support this RFC and is still in widespread use is qmail. There is a patch for qmail but you'll have to apply it yourself. Leaving aside rants at how rubbish this whole thing is, I'd argue that this is not a bug in SpamAssassin indeed. P.S. I've been sending such "buggy" email for years and it seems that it never gets filtered as spam, which suggests that most people don't use rules like RCVD_IN_PBL when filtering spam. This might be why unpatched qmail remains usable to this day. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
