Kevin, Respectfully, I am concerned by this "consensus" as it seems to have been made without regard to the actual statistics. I might note the +1's were for inclusion, not for a particular manually set scores. While I have strong confidence in the goodness of Mailspike based upon its years of strong performance and good safety, these scores as set in your commit are over-aggressive and not based on our own statistics.
* Was setting these scores manually your response to my concerns about "reuse" and the difficulties we will face in GA rescoring? I might even agree with this solution, although I believe it can be refined with further discussion. * Did you really intend for Mailspike to add a total of 4.1 or 4.5 points? (Given _BL is a composite rule that adds 1.0 on top of _L5 or _ZBI.) * Note: I never suggested Mailspike inclusion in pre-3.4.0 rules. * Whitelists - yes, entirely different issue. Could we have a separate discussion about our overall whitelist strategy? (Writing in that separate bug...) Warren
