On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgr...@pccc.com> wrote: > As for the gap, the behavior of what people think things do and what they > actually do on the infrastructure sometimes differs more than I like. You > and I need to setup a box that replaces zones and zones2 that is more > modern.
Totally in agreement. This would be a pretty major project even for someone working full-time. Maybe we could prepare now to get Google Summer of Code funding for this? >> * Set the scores to be conservative (see AXB's post) prior to GA >> balancing. Let ZBI and L's float in GA rescoring. Then adjust L's to >> be linear and increase the H's conservatively after we look at the GA >> results and do some quick fp-fn tests across the entire set. >> >> if (version>= 3.400000) >> #MAILSPIKE RBL ENABLED FOR SA3.4 and above - BUG 6400 >> # FLOATING SCORES FOR GA - adjust after GA to make L3 to L5 linear >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_ZBI 2.7 >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 2.5 >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L4 1.7 >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3 0.9 >> # TEMPORARILY FIXED SCORES - adjust these higher after we look at the GA >> results >> # (pending discussion: none of the whitelists should effect the >> blacklist balancing as they are orthogonal.) >> # I suspect these should be something like H3 = 0.5, H4 = 1.0, H5 = >> 2.0, alongside big reductions in IADB and DNSWL. >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 -0.01 >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 -0.01 >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 -0.01 >> ## These are informational rules, useful in statistical comparisons >> # FIXED SCORES - leave these scores this way for release >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL 0.01 >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL -0.01 >> endif > > Your process makes sense and I'll look forward to reviewing the proposed > rule scores as much as the process to determine your score recommendations. I suspect the auto-balanced scores will be much lower than what you proposed, but given our inability to do a proper apples-to-apples comparison due to the "reuse" issue, combined with our gut feelings that MSPIKE is better than what we observe in masscheck, I would probably manually adjust the scores higher a bit. Warren