On Saturday January 5 2013 01:07:09 John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > FYI that rule_name.t failed for me during a make disttest.
>
> I'm getting this with an up-to-date sandbox:
>
> Test Summary Report
> -------------------
> t/rule_names.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
> Files=167, Tests=3079, 1551 wallclock secs ( 1.61 usr 0.36 sys + 920.64
> cusr 37.64 csys = 960.25 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
> Failed 1/167 test programs. 0/3079 subtests failed.
Yes, my fault, I've seen it.
Still need to figure out how to deal with Test::plan which
wants to be called in a BEGIN {}, yet we only have the necessary
information available later on, after rules have been parsed.
Mark
