On Sat, 5 Jan 2013, Mark Martinec wrote:

t/rule_names.t                  (Wstat: 0 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
   Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
Files=167, Tests=3079, 1551 wallclock secs ( 1.61 usr  0.36 sys + 920.64
cusr 37.64 csys = 960.25 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/167 test programs. 0/3079 subtests failed.

Yes, my fault, I've seen it.
Still need to figure out how to deal with Test::plan which
wants to be called in a BEGIN {}, yet we only have the necessary
information available later on, after rules have been parsed.

Should be better now:

$ svn ci -m 't/rule_names.t fix for
  "Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output"'
Sending t/rule_names.t
Committed revision 1429187.

Now it's skipping t/rule_names.t - was that the intent?

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhar...@impsec.org    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Liberals love sex ed because it teaches kids to be safe around their
  sex organs. Conservatives love gun education because it teaches kids
  to be safe around guns. However, both believe that the other's
  education goals lead to dangers too terrible to contemplate.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 13 days until Benjamin Franklin's 307th Birthday

Reply via email to