On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Axb wrote:
On 02/06/2014 09:55 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 2/6/2014 1:10 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Axb wrote:
>
> > On 02/06/2014 06:05 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:
> > > See <https://builds.apache.org/job/SpamAssassin-trunk/9383/changes>
> > >
> >
> > John
> >
> > Pls copy __BUGGED_IMG to your sandbox.
>
> Done.
>
> Can you wait until the weekend to start cleaning stuff up?
>
+1 though until after Tuesday's launch? Sorry to put a hurdle in front
of the clean up.
I was planning to wait for the next "sandbox rules report" anyway....
Been doing it slowly, trying not to break too much at once.
And I will start cleaning up my inter-sandbox dependencies this weekend.
That shouldn't break anything, though.
Question: if several contributors have the same rule in use in their
sandboxes after this cleanup, do we want per-contributor naming? Or is
that an indication that the rule should be made "permanent"?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
An operating system design that requires a system reboot in order to
install a document viewing utility does not earn my respect.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 days until Abraham Lincoln's and Charles Darwin's 205th Birthdays