On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Axb wrote:

On 02/06/2014 09:55 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
 On 2/6/2014 1:10 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>  On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Axb wrote:
> > > On 02/06/2014 06:05 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:
> > >   See <https://builds.apache.org/job/SpamAssassin-trunk/9383/changes>
> > > > > > > John > > > > Pls copy __BUGGED_IMG to your sandbox. > > Done. > > Can you wait until the weekend to start cleaning stuff up?
>
 +1 though until after Tuesday's launch?  Sorry to put a hurdle in front
 of the clean up.

I was planning to wait for the next "sandbox rules report" anyway....

Been doing it slowly, trying not to break too much at once.

And I will start cleaning up my inter-sandbox dependencies this weekend. That shouldn't break anything, though.

Question: if several contributors have the same rule in use in their sandboxes after this cleanup, do we want per-contributor naming? Or is that an indication that the rule should be made "permanent"?

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 [email protected]    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a [email protected]
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 An operating system design that requires a system reboot in order to
 install a document viewing utility does not earn my respect.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 6 days until Abraham Lincoln's and Charles Darwin's 205th Birthdays

Reply via email to