On 4/7/2014 11:26 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Axb wrote:
On 04/07/2014 05:03 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 4/5/2014 12:59 PM, Axb wrote:
> > On 04/05/2014 06:42 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> > > I'd rather not have to resort to hitting the masscheck
system over
> > the
> > > head with the "tflags publish" cluebat, but I will if it keeps
> > ignoring
> > > these rules.
> > > > this would by very unwise and would create rule bloat as
obviosuly > > the
> > corpus isn't seeing much spams with whatever pattern you'd wan to
> > publish.
> > According to the wiki, the tflags publish is required to publish
> rules: rules without an explicit "tflags publish" line are never
> published
> > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SaUpdateBackend
Unless "tflags publish" is the default, that doesn't seem to be the
current behavior. Many of my rules do not have an explicit "tflags
publish" on them yet they are being published - for example,
TO_NO_BRKTS_MSFT
iirc, /trunk/rulesrc/10_force_active.cf was used for that
# # Force some sandbox rules to be active, since they have scores
assigned
# by the GA/Perceptron evolver. If you want to remove a rule from
# this list, be sure to remove it's 'score' line in rules/50_scores.cf
# too.
#
TO_NO_BRKTS_MSFT does not have a "publish" anywhere in SVN.
Agreed. I'll take a look and see why.
