On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 4/5/2014 12:59 PM, Axb wrote:
On 04/05/2014 06:42 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> I'd rather not have to resort to hitting the masscheck system over the
> head with the "tflags publish" cluebat, but I will if it keeps ignoring
> these rules.
this would by very unwise and would create rule bloat as obviosuly the
corpus isn't seeing much spams with whatever pattern you'd wan to publish.
According to the wiki, the tflags publish is required to publish rules: rules
without an explicit "tflags publish" line are never published
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SaUpdateBackend
Unless "tflags publish" is the default, that doesn't seem to be the
current behavior. Many of my rules do not have an explicit "tflags
publish" on them yet they are being published - for example,
TO_NO_BRKTS_MSFT
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
...every time I sit down in front of a Windows machine I feel as
if the computer is just a place for the manufacturers to put their
advertising. -- fwadling on Y! SCOX
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 days until Thomas Jefferson's 271st Birthday
