https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7826
--- Comment #34 from Henrik Krohns <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #32) > > Please remember with votes being made on this thread, you should be waiting > 72 hours for people to weigh in. People have weighted in. > Please leave this ticket for me to work on. I'm working on it and rolling > things back is breaking a lot of work we are doing on two systems in the > background. Again, who is "we"? Why would _trunk_ have any effect in your "two systems"? Use a branch as suggested, so no other change in trunk will bother your testings etc. And people will actually have something to weight in, before things break!! > Trunk is unreleased and no rules are pending release so masscheck being > broken is a null impact. Uh huh. No. >From the way this bug started, I have little faith in the way you are going on about it. Is there even a plan?? Where is it? What things are you going to rename? What things are you going to break? "I'm going to rename WLBL to ALBL... uhh no it's not necessary to rename it..", how about actually posting the complete plan and waiting for people to weight in on all the renames? Or do as suggested and go on implementing the things in trunk so we have review and test the changes easily, instead of yet again more questions in mailing lists on why there are errors and why rule updates are not working etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
