https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7826
--- Comment #36 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> --- I just committed a second version of the proof of concept for whitelist_to: svn commit -m 'changing whitelist_to to welcomelist_to including backward compatibility stubs and add a feature check instead of using a version test for rules.' Sending MANIFEST Sending lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm Sending lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/WLBLEval.pm Sending rules/30_text_de.cf Sending rules/30_text_fr.cf Sending rules/30_text_pl.cf Sending rules/30_text_pt_br.cf Sending rules/50_scores.cf Sending rules/60_whitelist.cf Sending rules/active.list Sending rules/v343.pre Sending t/whitelist_to.t Transmitting file data ............ Committed revision 1879735. As noted in the commit log, this uses welcomelist, has stubs for compatibility and uses if can(Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf::feature_blocklist_welcomelist) for the rule encapsulation. Using WelcomeList and BlockList will allow all acronyms like WLBLEval and RBL to remain the same. As with before, if this proves to work, we will start on whitelist_from and move on to more routines until finished. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
