I don't think a branch would break things but my memory is that mass check is built on 3.4 specifically. I think a lot of scripts and whatnot need to be updated.
I am not a resource that remembers this just from a decade or so ago when I rebuilt the server. Henrik rebuilt it more recently so he might have better pointers. I am happy to help though. On Sat, Dec 17, 2022, 22:19 Sidney Markowitz <[email protected]> wrote: > Kevin A. McGrail wrote on 18/12/22 3:45 pm: > > One con is that we do need to get masscheck and various tools on the > > server to work with the new 4.0 release. I'm not sure my eyesight is > > good enough to do it anymore but I'm happy to help! > > Questions: > > If I were to go ahead and branch, would that break masscheck and/or any > other tools that are in use? If so, how do we coordinate doing the > branching with whatever has to be changed in those scripts and processes? > > Who besides you has the knowledge to make those changes? I've been > assuming that it is everyone I see doing masscheck and rule update and > ruleqa/sysdmin list stuff that I haven't involved myself with, but is > there actually more of a bottleneck going on? > > >
