-1 The following bug should be fixed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1817 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1712
------------------ Original ------------------ From: "Patrick Wendell";<pwend...@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, May 14, 2014 04:07 AM To: "dev@spark.apache.org"<dev@spark.apache.org>; Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 1.0.0 (rc5) Hey all - there were some earlier RC's that were not presented to the dev list because issues were found with them. Also, there seems to be some issues with the reliability of the dev list e-mail. Just a heads up. I'll lead with a +1 for this. On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Nan Zhu <zhunanmcg...@gmail.com> wrote: > just curious, where is rc4 VOTE? > > I searched my gmail but didn't find that? > > > > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: >> > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-1.0.0-rc5/ >> >> Good news is that the sigs, MD5 and SHA are all correct. >> >> Tiny note: the Maven artifacts use SHA1, while the binary artifacts >> use SHA512, which took me a bit of head-scratching to figure out. >> >> If another RC comes out, I might suggest making it SHA1 everywhere? >> But there is nothing wrong with these signatures and checksums. >> >> Now to look at the contents... >> .
