Hey Everyone, Just a heads up - I've sent other release candidates to the list, but they appear to be getting swallowed (i.e. they are not on nabble). I think there is an issue with Apache mail servers.
I'm going to keep trying... if you get duplicate e-mails I apologize in advance. On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your feedback. Since it's not a regression, it won't block > the release. > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:17 AM, witgo <wi...@qq.com> wrote: >> SPARK-1817 will cause users to get incorrect results and RDD.zip is common >> usage . >> This should be the highest priority. I think we should fix the bug,and >> should also test the previous release >> ------------------ Original ------------------ >> From: "Patrick Wendell";<pwend...@gmail.com>; >> Date: Wed, May 14, 2014 03:02 PM >> To: "dev@spark.apache.org"<dev@spark.apache.org>; >> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 1.0.0 (rc5) >> >> >> >> Hey @witgo - those bugs are not severe enough to block the release, >> but it would be nice to get them fixed. >> >> At this point we are focused on severe bugs with an immediate fix, or >> regressions from previous versions of Spark. Anything that misses this >> release will get merged into the branch-1.0 branch and make it into >> the 1.0.1 release, so people will have access to it. >> >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:32 PM, witgo <wi...@qq.com> wrote: >>> -1 >>> The following bug should be fixed: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1817 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1712 >>> >>> >>> ------------------ Original ------------------ >>> From: "Patrick Wendell";<pwend...@gmail.com>; >>> Date: Wed, May 14, 2014 04:07 AM >>> To: "dev@spark.apache.org"<dev@spark.apache.org>; >>> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 1.0.0 (rc5) >>> >>> >>> >>> Hey all - there were some earlier RC's that were not presented to the >>> dev list because issues were found with them. Also, there seems to be >>> some issues with the reliability of the dev list e-mail. Just a heads >>> up. >>> >>> I'll lead with a +1 for this. >>> >>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Nan Zhu <zhunanmcg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> just curious, where is rc4 VOTE? >>>> >>>> I searched my gmail but didn't find that? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: >>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-1.0.0-rc5/ >>>>> >>>>> Good news is that the sigs, MD5 and SHA are all correct. >>>>> >>>>> Tiny note: the Maven artifacts use SHA1, while the binary artifacts >>>>> use SHA512, which took me a bit of head-scratching to figure out. >>>>> >>>>> If another RC comes out, I might suggest making it SHA1 everywhere? >>>>> But there is nothing wrong with these signatures and checksums. >>>>> >>>>> Now to look at the contents... >>>>> >>> . >> .
