I'm cancelling this vote in favor of rc6.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: >>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-1.0.0-rc5/ >> >> Good news is that the sigs, MD5 and SHA are all correct. >> >> Tiny note: the Maven artifacts use SHA1, while the binary artifacts >> use SHA512, which took me a bit of head-scratching to figure out. >> >> If another RC comes out, I might suggest making it SHA1 everywhere? >> But there is nothing wrong with these signatures and checksums. >> >> Now to look at the contents... > > This is a bit of drudgery that probably needs to be done too: a review > of the LICENSE and NOTICE file. Having dumped the licenses of > dependencies, I don't believe these reflect all of the software that's > going to be distributed in 1.0. > > (Good news is there's no forbidden license stuff included AFAICT.) > > And good news is that NOTICE can be auto-generated, largely, with a > Maven plugin. This can be done manually for now. > > And there is a license plugin that will list all known licenses of > transitive dependencies so that LICENSE can be filled out fairly > easily. > > What say? want a JIRA with details?
