Krishna,

Thanks for testing every release!


On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Krishna Sankar <ksanka...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding, of course)
>
> 1. Compiled OSX 10.10 (Yosemite) OK Total time: 26:48 min
>      mvn clean package -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.6 -DskipTests
> 2. Tested pyspark, mllib (iPython 4.0, FYI, notebook install is separate
> “conda install python” and then “conda install jupyter”)
> 2.1. statistics (min,max,mean,Pearson,Spearman) OK
> 2.2. Linear/Ridge/Laso Regression OK
> 2.3. Decision Tree, Naive Bayes OK
> 2.4. KMeans OK
>        Center And Scale OK
> 2.5. RDD operations OK
>       State of the Union Texts - MapReduce, Filter,sortByKey (word count)
> 2.6. Recommendation (Movielens medium dataset ~1 M ratings) OK
>        Model evaluation/optimization (rank, numIter, lambda) with
> itertools OK
> 3. Scala - MLlib
> 3.1. statistics (min,max,mean,Pearson,Spearman) OK
> 3.2. LinearRegressionWithSGD OK
> 3.3. Decision Tree OK
> 3.4. KMeans OK
> 3.5. Recommendation (Movielens medium dataset ~1 M ratings) OK
> 3.6. saveAsParquetFile OK
> 3.7. Read and verify the 4.3 save(above) - sqlContext.parquetFile,
> registerTempTable, sql OK
> 3.8. result = sqlContext.sql("SELECT
> OrderDetails.OrderID,ShipCountry,UnitPrice,Qty,Discount FROM Orders INNER
> JOIN OrderDetails ON Orders.OrderID = OrderDetails.OrderID") OK
> 4.0. Spark SQL from Python OK
> 4.1. result = sqlContext.sql("SELECT * from people WHERE State = 'WA'") OK
> 5.0. Packages
> 5.1. com.databricks.spark.csv - read/write OK (--packages
> com.databricks:spark-csv_2.10:1.2.0)
> 6.0. DataFrames
> 6.1. cast,dtypes OK
> 6.2. groupBy,avg,crosstab,corr,isNull,na.drop OK
> 6.3. All joins,sql,set operations,udf OK
> *Notes:*
> 1. Speed improvement in DataFrame functions groupBy, avg,sum et al. *Good
> work*. I am working on a project to reduce processing time from ~24 hrs
> to ... Let us see what Spark does. The speedups would help a lot.
> 2. FYI, UDFs getM and getY work now (Thanks). Slower; saturates the CPU. A
> non-scientific snapshot below. I know that this really has to be done more
> rigorously, on a bigger machine, with more cores et al..
> [image: Inline image 1] [image: Inline image 2]
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote:
>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
>> 1.5.1. The vote is open until Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 10:00 UTC and passes if
>> a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 1.5.1
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>
>>
>> The release fixes 81 known issues in Spark 1.5.0, listed here:
>> http://s.apache.org/spark-1.5.1
>>
>> The tag to be voted on is v1.5.1-rc1:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4df97937dbf68a9868de58408b9be0bf87dbbb94
>>
>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-1.5.1-rc1-bin/
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc
>>
>> The staging repository for this release (1.5.1) can be found at:
>> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1148/
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1148/>*
>>
>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-1.5.1-rc1-docs/
>>
>>
>> =======================================
>> How can I help test this release?
>> =======================================
>> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking an
>> existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
>> reporting any regressions.
>>
>> ================================================
>> What justifies a -1 vote for this release?
>> ================================================
>> -1 vote should occur for regressions from Spark 1.5.0. Bugs already
>> present in 1.5.0 will not block this release.
>>
>> ===============================================================
>> What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 1.5.1?
>> ===============================================================
>> Please target 1.5.2 or 1.6.0.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to