I think it will make sense to show a sample implementation of
UserDefinedAggregateFunction
for DataFrames, and an example of the Aggregator API for typed Datasets.

Jim, what if I submit a PR and you join the review process? I also do not
mind to split this if you want, but it seems to be an overkill for this
part.

Jayesh, shall I skip the window functions part since you are going to work
on that?

2016-12-15 22:48 GMT+01:00 Thakrar, Jayesh <jthak...@conversantmedia.com>:

> I too am interested in expanding the documentation for Spark SQL.
>
> For my work I needed to get some info/examples/guidance on window
> functions and have been using https://databricks.com/blog/
> 2015/07/15/introducing-window-functions-in-spark-sql.html .
>
> How about divide and conquer?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Michael Armbrust <mich...@databricks.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 3:21 PM
> *To: *Jim Hughes <jn...@ccri.com>
> *Cc: *"dev@spark.apache.org" <dev@spark.apache.org>
> *Subject: *Re: Expand the Spark SQL programming guide?
>
>
>
> Pull requests would be welcome for any major missing features in the
> guide: https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/docs/
> sql-programming-guide.md
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jim Hughes <jn...@ccri.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Anton,
>
> I'd like to see this as well.  I've been working on implementing
> geospatial user-defined types and functions.  Having examples of
> aggregations and window functions would be awesome!
>
> I did test out implementing a distributed convex hull as a
> UserDefinedAggregateFunction, and that seemed to work sensibly.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> On 12/15/2016 03:28 AM, Anton Okolnychyi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am wondering whether it makes sense to expand the Spark SQL programming
> guide with examples of aggregations (including user-defined via the
> Aggregator API) and window functions.  For instance, there might be a
> separate subsection under "Getting Started" for each functionality.
>
>
>
> SPARK-16046 seems to be related but there is no activity for more than 4
> months.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Anton
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to