RC5 is also tested on CentOS 6.8, OpenJDK 1.8.0_111, R 3.3.2 with profiles `-Pyarn -Phadoop-2.7 -Pkinesis-asl -Phive -Phive-thriftserver -Psparkr`.
BTW, there still exist five on-going issues in JIRA (with target version 2.1.0). 1. SPARK-16845 org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$SpecificOrdering" grows beyond 64 KB 2. SPARK-18669 Update Apache docs regard watermarking in Structured Streaming 3. SPARK-18894 Event time watermark delay threshold specified in months or years gives incorrect results 4. SPARK-18899 append data to a bucketed table with mismatched bucketing should fail +1 with known issues for now. Bests, Dongjoon. On 2016-12-16 09:57 (-0800), Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > (If you have a template for these emails, maybe update it to use https > links. They work for apache.org domains. After all we are asking people to > verify the integrity of release artifacts, so it might as well be secure.) > > (Also the new archives use .tar.gz instead of .tgz like the others. No big > deal, my OCD eye just noticed it.) > > I don't see an Apache license / notice for the Pyspark or SparkR artifacts. > It would be good practice to include this in a convenience binary. I'm not > sure if it's strictly mandatory, but something to adjust in any event. I > think that's all there is to do for SparkR. For Pyspark, which packages a > bunch of dependencies, it does include the licenses (good) but I think it > should include the NOTICE file. > > This is the first time I recall getting 0 test failures off the bat! > I'm using Java 8 / Ubuntu 16 and yarn/hive/hadoop-2.7 profiles. > > I think I'd +1 this therefore unless someone knows that the license issue > above is real and a blocker. > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:17 AM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version > > 2.1.0. The vote is open until Sun, December 18, 2016 at 21:30 PT and passes > > if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.1.0 > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > > > > To learn more about Apache Spark, please see http://spark.apache.org/ > > > > The tag to be voted on is v2.1.0-rc5 > > (cd0a08361e2526519e7c131c42116bf56fa62c76) > > > > List of JIRA tickets resolved are: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.0 > > > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: > > http://home.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.1.0-rc5-bin/ > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc > > > > The staging repository for this release can be found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1223/ > > > > The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at: > > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.1.0-rc5-docs/ > > > > > > *FAQ* > > > > *How can I help test this release?* > > > > If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking an > > existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then > > reporting any regressions. > > > > *What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 2.1.0?* > > > > Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug fixes, > > documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should be worked on > > immediately. Everything else please retarget to 2.1.1 or 2.2.0. > > > > *What happened to RC3/RC5?* > > > > They had issues withe release packaging and as a result were skipped. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
