+1 (non-binding)
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 11:45 PM Liwei Lin <lwl...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Cheers, > Liwei > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Yuming Wang <wgy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I hope https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16252 can be fixed until > release 2.1.0. It's a fix for broadcast cannot fit in memory. > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Joseph Bradley <jos...@databricks.com> > wrote: > > +1 > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Herman van Hövell tot Westerflier < > hvanhov...@databricks.com> wrote: > > +1 > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > Xiao Li > > 2016-12-16 12:19 GMT-08:00 Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>: > > For R we have a license field in the DESCRIPTION, and this is standard > practice (and requirement) for R packages. > > https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-exts.html#Licensing > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> > *Sent:* Friday, December 16, 2016 9:57:15 AM > *To:* Reynold Xin; dev@spark.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Apache Spark 2.1.0 (RC5) > > (If you have a template for these emails, maybe update it to use https > links. They work for apache.org domains. After all we are asking people > to verify the integrity of release artifacts, so it might as well be > secure.) > > (Also the new archives use .tar.gz instead of .tgz like the others. No big > deal, my OCD eye just noticed it.) > > I don't see an Apache license / notice for the Pyspark or SparkR > artifacts. It would be good practice to include this in a convenience > binary. I'm not sure if it's strictly mandatory, but something to adjust in > any event. I think that's all there is to do for SparkR. For Pyspark, which > packages a bunch of dependencies, it does include the licenses (good) but I > think it should include the NOTICE file. > > This is the first time I recall getting 0 test failures off the bat! > I'm using Java 8 / Ubuntu 16 and yarn/hive/hadoop-2.7 profiles. > > I think I'd +1 this therefore unless someone knows that the license issue > above is real and a blocker. > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:17 AM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version > 2.1.0. The vote is open until Sun, December 18, 2016 at 21:30 PT and passes > if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.1.0 > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > To learn more about Apache Spark, please see http://spark.apache.org/ > > The tag to be voted on is v2.1.0-rc5 > (cd0a08361e2526519e7c131c42116bf56fa62c76) > > List of JIRA tickets resolved are: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.0 > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: > http://home.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.1.0-rc5-bin/ > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc > > The staging repository for this release can be found at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1223/ > > The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at: > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.1.0-rc5-docs/ > > > *FAQ* > > *How can I help test this release?* > > If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking an > existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then > reporting any regressions. > > *What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 2.1.0?* > > Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug fixes, > documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should be worked on > immediately. Everything else please retarget to 2.1.1 or 2.2.0. > > *What happened to RC3/RC5?* > > They had issues withe release packaging and as a result were skipped. > > > > > > -- > > Herman van Hövell > > Software Engineer > > Databricks Inc. > > hvanhov...@databricks.com > > +31 6 420 590 27 > > databricks.com > > [image: http://databricks.com] <http://databricks.com/> > > > > > -- > > Joseph Bradley > > Software Engineer - Machine Learning > > Databricks, Inc. > > [image: http://databricks.com] <http://databricks.com/> > > > >
