I'm fine without a vote. (are we voting on wether we need a vote?)
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > I think a VOTE is over-thinking it, and is rarely used, but, can't hurt. > Nah, anyone can call a vote. This really isn't that formal. We just want to > declare and document consensus. > > I think SPIP is just a remix of existing process anyway, and don't think > it will actually do much anyway, which is why I am sanguine about the whole > thing. > > To bring this to a conclusion, I will just put the contents of the doc in > an email tomorrow for a VOTE. Raise any objections now. > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:39 PM Cody Koeninger <c...@koeninger.org> wrote: > >> I started this idea as a fork with a merge-able change to docs. >> Reynold moved it to his google doc, and has suggested during this >> email thread that a vote should occur. >> If a vote needs to occur, I can't see anything on >> http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html suggesting that I can call >> for a vote, which is why I'm asking PMC members to do it since they're >> the ones who would vote anyway. >> Now Sean is saying this is a code/doc change that can just be reviewed >> and merged as usual...which is what I tried to do to begin with. >> >> The fact that you haven't agreed on a process to agree on your process >> is, I think, an indication that the process really does need >> improvement ;) >> >>
