Spark 1.5.1 had 87 issues fix version 1 month after 1.5.0.

Spark 1.6.1 had 123 issues 2 months after 1.6.0

2.0.1 was larger (317 issues) at 3 months after 2.0.0 - makes sense due to
how large a release it was.

We are at 185 for 2.1.1 and 3 months after (and not released yet so it
could slip further) - so not totally unusual as the release interval has
certainly increased, but in fairness probably a bit later than usual. I'd
say definitely makes sense to cut the RC!



On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 at 02:06 Michael Armbrust <mich...@databricks.com>
wrote:

> Hey Holden,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up!  I think we usually cut patch releases when
> there are enough fixes to justify it.  Sometimes just a few weeks after the
> release.  I guess if we are at 3 months Spark 2.1.0 was a pretty good
> release :)
>
> That said, it is probably time. I was about to start thinking about 2.2 as
> well (we are a little past the posted code-freeze deadline), so I'm happy
> to push the buttons etc (this is a very good description
> <http://spark.apache.org/release-process.html> if you are curious). I
> would love help watching JIRA, posting the burn down on issues and
> shepherding in any critical patches.  Feel free to ping me off-line if you
> like to coordinate.
>
> Unless there are any objections, how about we aim for an RC of 2.1.1 on
> Monday and I'll also plan to cut branch-2.2 then?  (I'll send a separate
> email on this as well).
>
> Michael
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
> wrote:
>
> I'd be happy to do the work of coordinating a 2.1.1 release if that's a
> thing a committer can do (I think the release coordinator for the most
> recent Arrow release was a committer and the final publish step took a PMC
> member to upload but other than that I don't remember any issues).
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:05 PM Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> It seems reasonable to me, in that other x.y.1 releases have followed ~2
> months after the x.y.0 release and it's been about 3 months since 2.1.0.
>
> Related: creating releases is tough work, so I feel kind of bad voting for
> someone else to do that much work. Would it make sense to deputize another
> release manager to help get out just the maintenance releases? this may in
> turn mean maintenance branches last longer. Experienced hands can continue
> to manage new minor and major releases as they require more coordination.
>
> I know most of the release process is written down; I know it's also still
> going to be work to make it 100% documented. Eventually it'll be necessary
> to make sure it's entirely codified anyway.
>
> Not pushing for it myself, just noting I had heard this brought up in side
> conversations before.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:07 PM Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> wrote:
>
> Hi Spark Devs,
>
> Spark 2.1 has been out since end of December
> <http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Announcing-Apache-Spark-2-1-0-td20390.html>
> and we've got quite a few fixes merged for 2.1.1
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18281?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.1%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC>
> .
>
> On the Python side one of the things I'd like to see us get out into a
> patch release is a packaging fix (now merged) before we upload to PyPI &
> Conda, and we also have the normal batch of fixes like toLocalIterator for
> large DataFrames in PySpark.
>
> I've chatted with Felix & Shivaram who seem to think the R side is looking
> close to in good shape for a 2.1.1 release to submit to CRAN (if I've
> miss-spoken my apologies). The two outstanding issues that are being
> tracked for R are SPARK-18817, SPARK-19237.
>
> Looking at the other components quickly it seems like structured streaming
> could also benefit from a patch release.
>
> What do others think - are there any issues people are actively targeting
> for 2.1.1? Is this too early to be considering a patch release?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Holden
> --
> Cell : 425-233-8271 <(425)%20233-8271>
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>
> --
> Cell : 425-233-8271 <(425)%20233-8271>
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>
>
>

Reply via email to