Sounds good to me. Thanks! Today, we merged another correctness fix https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21772.
Xiao 2018-07-29 18:31 GMT-07:00 Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com>: > Sure, I will do a next RC. I'm still waiting for a CVE fix, if this can be > done in this two days, I will also include that one. > > Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> 于2018年7月28日周六 上午12:05写道： > >> The following blocker/important fixes have been merged to Spark 2.3 >> branch: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24927 >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24867 >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24891 >> >> *Saisai*, could you start the next RC? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Xiao >> >> >> 2018-07-20 14:21 GMT-07:00 Tom Graves <tgraves...@yahoo.com>: >> >>> fyi, I merged in a couple jira that were critical (and I thought would >>> be good to include in the next release) that if we spin another RC will get >>> included, we should update the jira SPARK-24755 >>> <https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d0280ab818391fd11662647459f1e9e683b2bc8e> >>> and SPARK-24677 >>> <https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7be70e29dd92de36dbb30ce39623d588f48e4cac>, >>> if anyone disagrees we could back those out but I think they would be good >>> to include. >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> On Thursday, July 19, 2018, 8:13:23 PM CDT, Saisai Shao < >>> sai.sai.s...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sure, I can wait for this and create another RC then. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Saisai >>> >>> Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> 于2018年7月20日周五 上午9:11写道： >>> >>> Yes. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24867 is the one I >>> created. The PR has been created. Since this is not rare, let us merge it >>> to 2.3.2? >>> >>> Reynold' PR is to get rid of AnalysisBarrier. That is better than >>> multiple patches we added for AnalysisBarrier after 2.3.0 release. We can >>> target it to 2.4. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Xiao >>> >>> 2018-07-19 17:48 GMT-07:00 Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> I see, thanks Reynold. >>> >>> Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> 于2018年7月20日周五 上午8:46写道： >>> >>> Looking at the list of pull requests it looks like this is the ticket: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24867 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:25 PM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: >>> >>> I don't think my ticket should block this release. It's a big general >>> refactoring. >>> >>> Xiao do you have a ticket for the bug you found? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:24 PM Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Xiao, >>> >>> Are you referring to this JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/ >>> jira/browse/SPARK-24865)? >>> >>> Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> 于2018年7月20日周五 上午2:41写道： >>> >>> dfWithUDF.cache() >>> dfWithUDF.write.saveAsTable("t") >>> dfWithUDF.write.saveAsTable("t1") >>> >>> >>> Cached data is not being used. It causes a big performance regression. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2018-07-19 11:32 GMT-07:00 Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> What regression are you referring to here? A -1 vote really needs a >>> rationale. >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 1:27 PM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I would first vote -1. >>> >>> I might find another regression caused by the analysis barrier. Will >>> keep you posted. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>
