Although I am not specifically involved in DSv2, I think having this kind
of meeting is definitely helpful to discuss, move certain effort forward
and keep people on the same page. Glad to see this kind of working group
happening.

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 5:58 PM John Zhuge <jzh...@apache.org> wrote:

> Great idea!
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 1:10 PM Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> There's been some great discussion for DataSourceV2 in the last few
>> months, but it has been difficult to resolve some of the discussions and I
>> don't think that we have a very clear roadmap for getting the work done.
>>
>> To coordinate better as a community, I'd like to start a regular sync-up
>> over google hangouts. We use this in the Parquet community to have more
>> effective community discussions about thorny technical issues and to get
>> aligned on an overall roadmap. It is really helpful in that community and I
>> think it would help us get DSv2 done more quickly.
>>
>> Here's how it works: people join the hangout, we go around the list to
>> gather topics, have about an hour-long discussion, and then send a summary
>> of the discussion to the dev list for anyone that couldn't participate.
>> That way we can move topics along, but we keep the broader community in the
>> loop as well for further discussion on the mailing list.
>>
>> I'll volunteer to set up the sync and send invites to anyone that wants
>> to attend. If you're interested, please reply with the email address you'd
>> like to put on the invite list (if there's a way to do this without
>> specific invites, let me know). Also for the first sync, please note what
>> times would work for you so we can try to account for people in different
>> time zones.
>>
>> For the first one, I was thinking some day next week (time TBD by those
>> interested) and starting off with a general roadmap discussion before
>> diving into specific technical topics.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> rb
>>
>> --
>> Ryan Blue
>> Software Engineer
>> Netflix
>>
>
>
> --
> John Zhuge
>

Reply via email to