Correction: +0 vote doesn't mean "Don't really care". Thanks Ryan for the offline reminder! Below is the Apache official interpretation <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#expressing-votes-1-0-1-and-fractions> of fraction values:
The in-between values are indicative of how strongly the voting individual feels. Here are some examples of fractional votes and ways in which they might be intended and interpreted: +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with this.' -0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.' -0.5: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational justification for my feelings.' ++1: 'Wow! I like this! Let's do it!' -0.9: 'I really don't like this, but I'm not going to stand in the way if everyone else wants to go ahead with it.' +0.9: 'This is a cool idea and i like it, but I don't have time/the skills necessary to help out.' On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:31 AM Martin Junghanns <martin.jungha...@neotechnology.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi Dongjoon, > > Thanks for the hint! I updated the SPIP accordingly. > > I also changed the access permissions for the SPIP and design sketch docs > so that anyone can comment. > > Best, > > Martin > On 29.01.19 18:59, Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > > Hi, Xiangrui Meng. > > +1 for the proposal. > > However, please update the following section for this vote. As we see, it > seems to be inaccurate because today is Jan. 29th. (Almost February). > (Since I cannot comment on the SPIP, I replied here.) > > Q7. How long will it take? > > - > > If accepted by the community by the end of December 2018, we predict > to be feature complete by mid-end March, allowing for QA during April 2019, > making the SPIP part of the next major Spark release (3.0, ETA May, 2019). > > Bests, > Dongjoon. > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:52 AM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Jules Damji <dmat...@comcast.net> 于2019年1月29日周二 上午8:14写道： >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> (Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in London. Well >>> attended & well received.) >>> >>> — >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :) >>> >>> On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> yay - let's do it! >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng <men...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994 >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25994>. It introduces a >>>> new DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports property graph >>>> construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. The proposal >>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ljqVsAh2wxTZS8XqwDQgRT6i_mania3ffYSYpEgLx9k/edit> >>>> was made available on user@ >>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/269cbffb04a0fbfe2ec298c3e95f01c05b47b5a72838004d27b74169@%3Cuser.spark.apache.org%3E> >>>> and dev@ >>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c4c9c9d31caa4a9be3dd99444e597b43f7cd2823e456be9f108e8193@%3Cdev.spark.apache.org%3E> >>>> to >>>> collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc attached to >>>> SPARK-26028 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26028>. >>>> >>>> The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your vote: >>>> >>>> +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP. >>>> +0: Don't really care. >>>> -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following >>>> technical reasons. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Xiangrui >>>> >>>
