+1, this is a very very important feature. Mingjie
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:42 AM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Change my vote from +1 to ++1 > > Xiangrui Meng <men...@gmail.com> 于2019年1月30日周三 上午6:20写道： > >> Correction: +0 vote doesn't mean "Don't really care". Thanks Ryan for the >> offline reminder! Below is the Apache official interpretation >> <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#expressing-votes-1-0-1-and-fractions> >> of fraction values: >> >> The in-between values are indicative of how strongly the voting >> individual feels. Here are some examples of fractional votes and ways in >> which they might be intended and interpreted: >> +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with this.' >> -0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.' >> -0.5: 'I don't like this idea, but I can't find any rational >> justification for my feelings.' >> ++1: 'Wow! I like this! Let's do it!' >> -0.9: 'I really don't like this, but I'm not going to stand in the way if >> everyone else wants to go ahead with it.' >> +0.9: 'This is a cool idea and i like it, but I don't have time/the >> skills necessary to help out.' >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:31 AM Martin Junghanns >> <martin.jungha...@neotechnology.com.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Hi Dongjoon, >>> >>> Thanks for the hint! I updated the SPIP accordingly. >>> >>> I also changed the access permissions for the SPIP and design sketch >>> docs so that anyone can comment. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Martin >>> On 29.01.19 18:59, Dongjoon Hyun wrote: >>> >>> Hi, Xiangrui Meng. >>> >>> +1 for the proposal. >>> >>> However, please update the following section for this vote. As we see, >>> it seems to be inaccurate because today is Jan. 29th. (Almost February). >>> (Since I cannot comment on the SPIP, I replied here.) >>> >>> Q7. How long will it take? >>> >>> - >>> >>> If accepted by the community by the end of December 2018, we predict >>> to be feature complete by mid-end March, allowing for QA during April >>> 2019, >>> making the SPIP part of the next major Spark release (3.0, ETA May, >>> 2019). >>> >>> Bests, >>> Dongjoon. >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:52 AM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Jules Damji <dmat...@comcast.net> 于2019年1月29日周二 上午8:14写道： >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> (Heard their proposed tech-talk at Spark + A.I summit in London. Well >>>>> attended & well received.) >>>>> >>>>> — >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :) >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 29, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> yay - let's do it! >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:28 AM Xiangrui Meng <men...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I want to call for a vote of SPARK-25994 >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25994>. It introduces a >>>>>> new DataFrame-based component to Spark, which supports property graph >>>>>> construction, Cypher queries, and graph algorithms. The proposal >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ljqVsAh2wxTZS8XqwDQgRT6i_mania3ffYSYpEgLx9k/edit> >>>>>> was made available on user@ >>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/269cbffb04a0fbfe2ec298c3e95f01c05b47b5a72838004d27b74169@%3Cuser.spark.apache.org%3E> >>>>>> and dev@ >>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c4c9c9d31caa4a9be3dd99444e597b43f7cd2823e456be9f108e8193@%3Cdev.spark.apache.org%3E> >>>>>> to >>>>>> collect input. You can also find a sketch design doc attached to >>>>>> SPARK-26028 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26028>. >>>>>> >>>>>> The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your >>>>>> vote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP. >>>>>> +0: Don't really care. >>>>>> -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following >>>>>> technical reasons. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Xiangrui >>>>>> >>>>>
