I will add one more condition for "updated". So, it will additionally avoid things updated within one year but left open against EOL releases.
project = SPARK AND status in (Open, "In Progress", Reopened) AND ( affectedVersion = EMPTY OR NOT (affectedVersion in versionMatch("^3.*") OR affectedVersion in versionMatch("^2.4.*") OR affectedVersion in versionMatch("^2.3.*") ) ) AND updated <= -52w https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12344168&jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20%0A%20%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%0A%20%20AND%20(%0A%20%20%20%20affectedVersion%20%3D%20EMPTY%20OR%0A%20%20%20%20NOT%20(affectedVersion%20in%20versionMatch(%22%5E3.*%22)%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20OR%20affectedVersion%20in%20versionMatch(%22%5E2.4.*%22)%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20OR%20affectedVersion%20in%20versionMatch(%22%5E2.3.*%22)%0A%20%20%20%20)%0A%20%20)%0A%20%20AND%20updated%20%3C%3D%20-52w This still reduces JIRAs under 1000 which I originally targeted. 2019년 5월 19일 (일) 오후 6:08, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > I'd only tweak this to perhaps not close JIRAs that have been updated > recently -- even just avoiding things updated in the last month. For > example this would close https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-27758 > which > was opened Friday (though, for other reasons it should probably be closed). > Still I don't mind it under the logic that it has been reported against > 2.1.0. > > On the other hand, I'd go further and close _anything_ not updated in a > long time, like a year (or 2 if feeling conservative). That is there's > probably a lot of old cruft out there that wasn't marked with an Affected > Version, before that was required. > > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 10:48 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks guys. >> >> This thread got more than 3 PMC votes without any objection. I slightly >> edited JQL from Abdeali's suggestion (thanks, Abdeali). >> >> >> JQL: >> >> project = SPARK >> AND status in (Open, "In Progress", Reopened) >> AND ( >> affectedVersion = EMPTY OR >> NOT (affectedVersion in versionMatch("^3.*") >> OR affectedVersion in versionMatch("^2.4.*") >> OR affectedVersion in versionMatch("^2.3.*") >> ) >> ) >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20%0A%20%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%0A%20%20AND%20(%0A%20%20%20%20affectedVersion%20%3D%20EMPTY%20OR%0A%20%20%20%20NOT%20(affectedVersion%20in%20versionMatch(%22%5E3.*%22)%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20OR%20affectedVersion%20in%20versionMatch(%22%5E2.4.*%22)%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20OR%20affectedVersion%20in%20versionMatch(%22%5E2.3.*%22)%0A%20%20%20%20)%0A%20%20) >> >> >> It means we will resolve all JIRAs that have EOL releases as affected >> versions, including no version specified in affected versions - this will >> reduce open JIRAs under 900. >> >> Looks I can use a bulk action feature in JIRA. Tomorrow at the similar >> time, I will >> - Label those JIRAs as 'bulk-closed' >> - Resolve them via `Incomplete` status. >> >> Please double check the list and let me know if you guys have any concern. >> >> >> >> >> >> 2019년 5월 18일 (토) 오후 12:22, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>님이 작성: >> >>> +1, too. >>> >>> Thank you, Hyukjin! >>> >>> Bests, >>> Dongjoon. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 9:07 AM Imran Rashid >>> <iras...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> +1, thanks for taking this on >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 7:26 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> oh, wait. 'Incomplete' can still make sense in this way then. >>>>> Yes, I am good with 'Incomplete' too. >>>>> >>>>> 2019년 5월 16일 (목) 오전 11:24, Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com>님이 작성: >>>>> >>>>>> I actually recently used 'Incomplete' a bit when the JIRA is >>>>>> basically too poorly formed (like just copying and pasting an error) ... >>>>>> >>>>>> I was thinking about 'Unresolved' status or `Auto Closed' too. I >>>>>> double checked they can be reopen as well after resolution. >>>>>> >>>>>> [image: Screen Shot 2019-05-16 at 10.35.14 AM.png] >>>>>> [image: Screen Shot 2019-05-16 at 10.35.39 AM.png] >>>>>> >>>>>> 2019년 5월 16일 (목) 오전 11:04, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com>님이 작성: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Agree, anything without an Affected Version should be old enough to >>>>>>> time out. >>>>>>> I might use "Incomplete" or something as the status, as we haven't >>>>>>> otherwise used that. Maybe that's simpler than a label. But, anything >>>>>>> like >>>>>>> that sounds good. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 8:40 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BTW, affected version became a required field (I don't remember >>>>>>>> when exactly was .. I believe it's around when we work on Spark 2.3): >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [image: Screen Shot 2019-05-16 at 10.29.50 AM.png] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So, including all EOL versions and affected versions not specified >>>>>>>> will roughly work. >>>>>>>> Using "Cannot Reproduce" as its status and 'bulk-closed' label >>>>>>>> makes the best sense to me. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Okie. I want to open this roughly for a week before taking an >>>>>>>> actual action for this. If there's no more feedback, I will do as I >>>>>>>> said ^ >>>>>>>> next week. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2019년 5월 15일 (수) 오후 11:33, Josh Rosen <rosenvi...@gmail.com>님이 작성: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 in favor of some sort of JIRA cleanup. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> My only request is that we attach some sort of 'bulk-closed' label >>>>>>>>> to issues that we close via JIRA filter batch operations (and resolve >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> issues as "Timed Out" / "Cannot Reproduce", not "Fixed"). Using a >>>>>>>>> label >>>>>>>>> makes it easier to audit what was closed, simplifying the process of >>>>>>>>> identifying and re-opening valid issues caught in our dragnet. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 7:19 AM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I gave up looking through JIRAs a long time ago, so, big respect >>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>> continuing to try to triage them. I am afraid we're missing a few >>>>>>>>>> important bug reports in the torrent, but most JIRAs are not >>>>>>>>>> well-formed, just questions, stale, or simply things that won't be >>>>>>>>>> added. I do think it's important to reflect that reality, and so >>>>>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>>>>> always in favor of more aggressively closing JIRAs. I think this >>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>> more standard practice, from projects like TensorFlow/Keras, >>>>>>>>>> pandas, >>>>>>>>>> etc to just automatically drop Issues that don't see activity for >>>>>>>>>> N >>>>>>>>>> days. We won't do that, but, are probably on the other hand far >>>>>>>>>> too >>>>>>>>>> lax in closing them. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Remember that JIRAs stay searchable and can be reopened, so it's >>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>> like we lose much information. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'd close anything that hasn't had activity in 2 years (?), as a >>>>>>>>>> start. >>>>>>>>>> I like the idea of closing things that only affect an EOL release, >>>>>>>>>> but, many items aren't marked, so may need to cast the net wider. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think only then does it make sense to look at bothering to >>>>>>>>>> reproduce >>>>>>>>>> or evaluate the 1000s that will still remain. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:25 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > Hi all, >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > I would like to propose to resolve all JIRAs that affects EOL >>>>>>>>>> releases - 2.2 and below. and affected version >>>>>>>>>> > not specified. I was rather against this way and considered >>>>>>>>>> this as last resort in roughly 3 years ago >>>>>>>>>> > when we discussed. Now I think we should go ahead with this. >>>>>>>>>> See below. >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > I have been talking care of this for so long time almost every >>>>>>>>>> day those 3 years. The number of JIRAs >>>>>>>>>> > keeps increasing and it does never go down. Now the number is >>>>>>>>>> going over 2500 JIRAs. >>>>>>>>>> > Did you guys know? in JIRA, we can only go through page by page >>>>>>>>>> up to 1000 items. So, currently we're even >>>>>>>>>> > having difficulties to go through every JIRA. We should >>>>>>>>>> manually filter out and check each. >>>>>>>>>> > The number is going over the manageable size. >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > I am not suggesting this without anything actually trying. This >>>>>>>>>> is what we have tried within my visibility: >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > 1. In roughly 3 years ago, Sean tried to gather committers >>>>>>>>>> and even non-committers people to sort >>>>>>>>>> > out this number. At that time, we were only able to keep >>>>>>>>>> this number as is. After we lost this momentum, >>>>>>>>>> > it kept increasing back. >>>>>>>>>> > 2. At least I scanned _all_ the previous JIRAs at least more >>>>>>>>>> than two times and resolved them. Roughly >>>>>>>>>> > once a year. The rest of them are mostly obsolete but not >>>>>>>>>> enough information to investigate further. >>>>>>>>>> > 3. I strictly stick to "Contributing to JIRA Maintenance" >>>>>>>>>> https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html and >>>>>>>>>> > resolve JIRAs. >>>>>>>>>> > 4. Promoting other people to comment on JIRA or actively >>>>>>>>>> resolve them. >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > One of the facts I realised is the increasing number of >>>>>>>>>> committers doesn't virtually help this much (although >>>>>>>>>> > it might be helpful if somebody active in JIRA becomes a >>>>>>>>>> committer.) >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > One of the important thing I should note is that, it's now >>>>>>>>>> almost pretty difficult to reproduce and test the >>>>>>>>>> > issues found in EOL releases. We should git clone, checkout, >>>>>>>>>> build and test. And then, see if that issue >>>>>>>>>> > still exists in upstream, and fix. This is non-trivial overhead. >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > Therefore, I would like to propose resolving _all_ the JIRAs >>>>>>>>>> that targets EOL releases - 2.2 and below. >>>>>>>>>> > Please let me know if anyone has some concerns or objections. >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > Thanks. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>