I think simply closing old issues with no activity in a long time is
OK. The "Affected Version" is somewhat noisy, so not even particularly
important to also query, but yeah I see some value in trying to limit
the scope this way.
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 10:15 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> HI all,
>
> We have resolved JIRAs that targets EOL releases (up to Spark 2.2.x) in order
> to make it
> the manageable size before.
> Since Spark 2.3.4 will be EOL release, I plan to do this again roughly in a
> week.
>
> The JIRAs that has not been updated for the last year, and having affect
> version of EOL releases will be:
> - Resolved as 'Incomplete' status
> - Has a 'bulk-closed' label.
>
> I plan to use this JQL
>
> project = SPARK
> AND status in (Open, "In Progress", Reopened)
> AND (
> affectedVersion = EMPTY OR
> NOT (affectedVersion in versionMatch("^3.*")
> OR affectedVersion in versionMatch("^2.4.*")
> )
> )
> AND updated <= -52w
>
>
> You could click this link and check.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20(affectedVersion%20%3D%20EMPTY%20OR%20NOT%20(affectedVersion%20in%20versionMatch(%22%5E3.*%22)%20OR%20affectedVersion%20in%20versionMatch(%22%5E2.4.*%22)))%20AND%20updated%20%3C%3D%20-52w
>
> Please let me know if you guys have any concern or opinion on this.
>
> Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
