+1 On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 8:40 PM Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 11:47, Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 7:51 AM John Zhuge <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> John Zhuge >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 2:37 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:51 PM serge rielau.com <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 it’s abt time. >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>> > On Feb 23, 2025, at 12:25 PM, L. C. Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > +1 >>>>> > >>>>> >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 7:51 AM Max Gekk <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Hi Spark devs, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the >>>>> SPIP [2]. The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. >>>>> New >>>>> type should conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT TIME ZONE as defined by the SQL >>>>> standard. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> This thread will be open for at least the next 72 hours. Please >>>>> vote accordingly, [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP [ ] +0 [ >>>>> ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>>>> >> >>>>> >> [1] >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/892vkskktqrx1czk9wm6l8vchpydrny2 >>>>> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-51162 >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Yours faithfully, >>>>> >> Max Gekk >>>>> > >>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> > To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>
