+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 2:26 PM Gengliang Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 8:40 PM Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 11:47, Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 7:51 AM John Zhuge <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> John Zhuge >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 2:37 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:51 PM serge rielau.com <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 it’s abt time. >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>> >>>>>> > On Feb 23, 2025, at 12:25 PM, L. C. Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > +1 >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 7:51 AM Max Gekk <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Hi Spark devs, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the >>>>>> SPIP [2]. The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. >>>>>> New >>>>>> type should conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT TIME ZONE as defined by the SQL >>>>>> standard. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> This thread will be open for at least the next 72 hours. Please >>>>>> vote accordingly, [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP [ ] +0 >>>>>> [ >>>>>> ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> [1] >>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/892vkskktqrx1czk9wm6l8vchpydrny2 >>>>>> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-51162 >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Yours faithfully, >>>>>> >> Max Gekk >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> > To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>
