Any thoughts on how to deal with performance here? Initially we didn't do nano level precision because of performance (would not be able to fit everything into a 64 bit int).
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:34 AM Sakthi <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:32 AM Zhou Jiang <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 for the nanosecond support >> >> >> > On Mar 16, 2025, at 16:03, Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > +1 for supporting NanoSecond Timestamps. >> > >> > Thank you, Qi. >> > >> > Dongjoon. >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected] >> >>
