What are you comparing performance against? On Mar 17, 2025 at 11:54 AM -0700, Reynold Xin <[email protected]>, wrote: Any thoughts on how to deal with performance here? Initially we didn't do nano level precision because of performance (would not be able to fit everything into a 64 bit int).
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:34 AM Sakthi <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:32 AM Zhou Jiang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: +1 for the nanosecond support > On Mar 16, 2025, at 16:03, Dongjoon Hyun > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > +1 for supporting NanoSecond Timestamps. > > Thank you, Qi. > > Dongjoon. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe e-mail: > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
