+1 (non-binding) To Nimrod and Mich,
From my understanding, the JDBC API is already a good and de facto abstraction layer for user to connect to the different database services to execute SQL, the Hive JDBC driver and the proposed Connect JDBC driver will use a different package name and can coexist under user's application classpath, the right driver will be selected automatically according to user provided JDBC URL, given that, I don't see much value to create an unified JDBC dirver that support both, this has a few benefits (stripe one dependency from user classpath?) but involves much efforts. Thanks, Cheng Pan > On Sep 24, 2025, at 12:12, Jules Damji <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > — > Sent from my iPhone > Pardon the dumb thumb typos :) > >> On Sep 23, 2025, at 3:03 AM, Ruifeng Zheng <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 5:13 PM Yang Jie <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> Jie Yang >>> >>> On 2025/09/23 05:04:14 Fu Chen wrote: >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > On 2025/09/22 13:04:37 杨杰 wrote: >>> > > Hi Spark devs, >>> > > >>> > > I would like to start a vote on the SPIP: JDBC Driver for Spark Connect >>> > > >>> > > Discussion thread: >>> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/rx5pqh01c86slpqv9161hqwgm5lwxxzq >>> > > SPIP: >>> > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ahk4C16o1Jj1TbLg5ylzgHjvu2Ic2zTrcMuvLjqSoAQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.1gf0bimgty0t >>> > > JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-53484 >>> > > >>> > > Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>> > > >>> > > [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>> > > [ ] +0 >>> > > [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because >>> > > >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>>
