+1 Dongjoon
On 2026/09/22 13:26:06 Peter Toth wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 2:43 PM Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 5:29 PM Uroš Bojanić <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> +1 for this, thank you for proposing and driving the maintenance release, > >> Szehon! > >> > >> I would be happy to help with driving other releases (e.g. 4.1.4), as I > >> mentioned in a new thread. > >> > >> Please let me know what you think, and let's coordinate the releases > >> together; we can also consider 4.0.5 (and possibly 3.5.10) maintenance too. > >> > >> On 2026/09/21 23:56:43 Szehon Ho wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > I'd like to start a discussion about releasing Apache Spark 4.2.1. > >> > > >> > I'm particularly interested in getting SPARK-59572 > >> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-59572> into 4.2.1. It > >> fixes a > >> > correctness issue introduced in 4.2.0 where failures to evaluate a DSv2 > >> > PartitionPredicate can be treated as matches, leading to incorrect query > >> > results. > >> > > >> > It's been over two months since Spark 4.2.0 was released in July. The > >> changes > >> > on branch-4.2 since 4.2.0 > >> > <https://github.com/apache/spark/compare/v4.2.0...branch-4.2> now > >> include > >> > 99 PRs covering 97 JIRA issues. Besides SPARK-59572, these include > >> > correctness and stability fixes across SQL, Core, Streaming, PySpark, > >> and > >> > Kubernetes, with several addressing storage-partitioned joins. > >> > > >> > I'm happy to volunteer to drive the release to learn the process! > >> > > >> > Would folks be in favor of moving forward with a 4.2.1 release? Are > >> there > >> > any other fixes or blockers we should address first? > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Szehon > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]
