Got it. And is there any plan to support Netezza? 2013/2/18 Jarek Jarcec Cecho <jar...@apache.org>
> Yes indeed it is - SQOOP-895 [1]. > > Jarcec > > Links: > 1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-895 > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:03:28AM +0800, sam liu wrote: > > Thanks, Jarek! > > > > And, is there any JIRA for tracking this? > > > > Sam Liu > > > > 2013/2/18 Jarek Jarcec Cecho <jar...@apache.org> > > > > > Hi Sam, > > > unfortunately this is not possible with Sqoop 1. However we've > redesigned > > > the architecture in Sqoop 2 to allow this. It's yet there, but it will > be > > > quite soon. > > > > > > Jarcec > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:43:26AM +0800, sam liu wrote: > > > > Hi Experts, > > > > > > > > Is it possible or has any other similar methods? Because we really > want > > > to > > > > hide all connection related parameters like username/password in a > > > > properties file, for improving security. Our Sqoop version is 1.4.2. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > Sam Liu > > > >
