+1
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Will McQueen <w...@cloudera.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Apr 1, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Hari Shreedharan <hshreedha...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Jarcec, >> >> Sounds great! I think that this is a good time for an incremental release >> for the Sqoop 2 branch with the number of issues fixed. >> >> +1 for community RM. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Hari >> >> -- >> Hari Shreedharan >> >> >> On Friday, March 29, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: >> >>> Hi Sqoop developers, >>> It has been 3 months since first release from Sqoop2 branch under version >>> 1.99.1. Since then there has been steady activity in the development >>> counting 75 closed JIRAs [1] with additional 9 soon to be resolved [2]. >>> There is countless bug fixes and several new features including but not >>> limited to adding scheme support in Generic JDBC Connector, brand new >>> client API or adding splitter for numeric/decimal type that is essentially >>> must have for imports from Oracle. >>> >>> That being said I would like to propose doing a new release in the 1.99 >>> line named 1.99.2. Sqoop PMC has agreed to follow the same model that was >>> in place for couple of previous releases where one committer will step up >>> as a Mentor and will guide community volunteer to do the release. I've step >>> up to be the mentor. >>> >>> During last release we had two community volunteers and sadly only one got >>> the chance to drive the release. Having said that I think that it would be >>> fair to give the opportunity to the other volunteer prior offering this >>> option to the broader community. >>> >>> I would love to hear others thoughts! >>> >>> Jarcec >>> >>> 1: http://s.apache.org/jw >>> 2: http://s.apache.org/SeI >> >>
