Thanks everyone. It looks like there is agreement in giving me the opportunity to volunteer as a community RM for this release. It is a great opportunity for me to learn and contribute in this capacity and my thanks and appreciation for the same. With that thought, I accept this opportunity.

Thanks

Venkat

On Mon Apr  1 14:55:56 2013, Kathleen Ting wrote:
+1

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Will McQueen <[email protected]> wrote:
+1

On Apr 1, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Hari Shreedharan <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Jarcec,

Sounds great! I think that this is a good time for an incremental release for 
the Sqoop 2 branch with the number of issues fixed.

+1 for community RM.


Thanks,
Hari

--
Hari Shreedharan


On Friday, March 29, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:

Hi Sqoop developers,
It has been 3 months since first release from Sqoop2 branch under version 
1.99.1. Since then there has been steady activity in the development counting 
75 closed JIRAs [1] with additional 9 soon to be resolved [2]. There is 
countless bug fixes and several new features including but not limited to 
adding scheme support in Generic JDBC Connector, brand new client API or adding 
splitter for numeric/decimal type that is essentially must have for imports 
from Oracle.

That being said I would like to propose doing a new release in the 1.99 line 
named 1.99.2. Sqoop PMC has agreed to follow the same model that was in place 
for couple of previous releases where one committer will step up as a Mentor 
and will guide community volunteer to do the release. I've step up to be the 
mentor.

During last release we had two community volunteers and sadly only one got the 
chance to drive the release. Having said that I think that it would be fair to 
give the opportunity to the other volunteer prior offering this option to the 
broader community.

I would love to hear others thoughts!

Jarcec

1: http://s.apache.org/jw
2: http://s.apache.org/SeI


Reply via email to