> On July 15, 2013, 10:21 a.m., Jarek Cecho wrote:
> > Hi Raghav, thank you very much for incorporating all my comments and 
> > suggestions. Please accept my apologies for being so nitpicky about that. 
> > The patch looks good to me, please upload the last version to the JIRA and 
> > I'll commit it.
> > 
> > Jarcec

I have uploaded the patch to the JIRA. Thanks for the reviewing.

- Raghav.


- Raghav


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12032/#review23162
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 11, 2013, 7:13 p.m., Raghav Gautam wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12032/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 11, 2013, 7:13 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SQOOP-906
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-906
> 
> 
> Repository: sqoop-trunk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Incremental import using lastmodified mode always assumes column type to be 
> TIMESTAMP which is causing issues with Oracle Connector. This patch fixes 
> that.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/java/org/apache/sqoop/manager/ConnManager.java c84c859 
>   src/java/org/apache/sqoop/manager/OracleManager.java 686bc19 
>   src/java/org/apache/sqoop/tool/ImportTool.java cb800b6 
>   src/test/com/cloudera/sqoop/TestIncrementalImport.java 02080df 
>   src/test/com/cloudera/sqoop/TestMerge.java 5010cf2 
>   src/test/com/cloudera/sqoop/ThirdPartyTests.java ada5c72 
>   src/test/com/cloudera/sqoop/testutil/BaseSqoopTestCase.java 877d7f8 
>   src/test/org/apache/sqoop/manager/oracle/OracleIncrementalImportTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12032/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Unit tests & oracle third party tests are passing. Also tested manually.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Raghav Gautam
> 
>

Reply via email to