[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14736056#comment-14736056 ]
Sqoop QA bot commented on SQOOP-2537: ------------------------------------- Testing file [SQOOP-2537.003.patch|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12754789/SQOOP-2537.003.patch] against branch sqoop2 took 0:55:12.309792. {color:red}Overall:{color} -1 due to an error(s), see details below: {color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Clean was successful {color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch applied correctly {color:red}ERROR:{color} Patch does not add/modify any test case {color:green}SUCCESS:{color} License check passed {color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch compiled {color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All unit tests passed (executed 1408 tests) {color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Test coverage did not decreased ([report|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/1675/artifact/patch-process/cobertura_report.txt]) {color:green}SUCCESS:{color} No new findbugs warnings ([report|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/1675/artifact/patch-process/findbugs_report.txt]) {color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All integration tests passed (executed 79 tests) Console output is available [here|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/1675/console]. This message is automatically generated. > Sqoop2: Use object name instead of object id for the name filed in MResource > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SQOOP-2537 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2537 > Project: Sqoop > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Dian Fu > Assignee: Dian Fu > Fix For: 1.99.7 > > Attachments: SQOOP-2537.001.patch, SQOOP-2537.003.patch > > > Currently the meaning of the name field in MResource isn't consistent. Some > places assume this field means the object name of the resource, such as in > AuthorizationRequestHandler. Some places assume this field means the object > id of the resource, such as in AuthorizationEngine. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)