[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14736857#comment-14736857
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SQOOP-2537:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 66989a6ec5176b17cf96fd582fa26382b773628f in sqoop's branch 
refs/heads/sqoop2 from [~jarcec]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;h=66989a6 ]

SQOOP-2537: Sqoop2: Use object name instead of object id for the name filed in 
MResource

(Dian Fu via Jarek Jarcec Cecho)


> Sqoop2: Use object name instead of object id for the name filed in MResource
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-2537
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2537
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Dian Fu
>            Assignee: Dian Fu
>             Fix For: 1.99.7
>
>         Attachments: SQOOP-2537.001.patch, SQOOP-2537.003.patch
>
>
> Currently the meaning of the name field in MResource isn't consistent. Some 
> places assume this field means the object name of the resource, such as in 
> AuthorizationRequestHandler. Some places assume this field means the object 
> id of the resource, such as in AuthorizationEngine.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to