> On Nov. 12, 2015, 7:47 p.m., Jarek Cecho wrote:
> > Thank you for the work here Colin! I have couple of high level comments:
> > 
> > 1) It seems that we have many dimensions that we want to try. Rather then 
> > using the generic methods, can we make the test parametrized in the same 
> > way we have other similar tests? Look at PartitionerTest as an example [1].
> > 
> > 2) Since now there is not "backup" solution in case of id, can we be more 
> > exhasive in the tests? Let's try all create/update/delete/read on 
> > jobs/links and start/stop/status on submissions.
> > 
> > Links:
> > 1: 
> > https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/sqoop2/test/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/integration/connector/jdbc/generic/PartitionerTest.java

For point 1, I'll update the test.
For point 2, you're right, we need test all the public interface with the name. 
I already fixed 3 bugs, still work on this. Thanks for reminder!!!


- Colin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/40216/#review106316
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 12, 2015, 6:27 a.m., Colin Ma wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/40216/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 12, 2015, 6:27 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Repository: sqoop-sqoop2
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add test cases for the object name with special char, eg, "." , "/", "?", "&" 
> etc.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> test/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/integration/server/InformalObjectNameTest.java
>  811315a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40216/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Colin Ma
> 
>

Reply via email to