Hi, just as an additional info. The Stanbol dev mailing list (as any other public list at the ASF) is archived.
You can search in this archive, e.g. at http://stanbol.markmail.org/ Best, - Fabian 2013/7/23 Tarandeep Singh, Sawhney <tsawh...@innodata.com>: > thanks so much Rupert for your reaponse. > > i recently joined dev community so wasnt aware of this issue reported > earlier also. > > thanks again and i will try out work around options you have suggested amd > will revert if some more help is needed > > best regards > tarandeep > On Jul 23, 2013 7:57 PM, "Rupert Westenthaler" < > rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Tarandeep, >> >> this Issue does not appear the first time here on the list. So you >> might also want to search the archives for more information. >> >> When using the Felix Webconsole to configure an OSGI component the >> size of the configuration MUST NOT exceed the headerBufferSize [1] of >> the embedded Jetty server. For more information see FELIX-3265 [2]. >> The problem is that with the currently released version of the Jetty >> plugin it is not possible to configure the headerBufferSize. >> >> To workaround this limitation you have three possibilities: >> >> 1. reduce the size of the configuration (e.g. by removing comment >> lines from the field mappings) >> 2. configure the Site using the configuration file located in >> "stanbol/fileinstall". Make sure that changes to the file confirm to >> the syntax required by the *.config files >> 3. running Stanbol as WAR within a Tomcat. In Tomcat you can configure >> the headerBufferSize like explained in [3] >> >> I usually use option (2) >> >> best >> Rupert >> >> >> [1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/Configuring+Connectors >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3265 >> [3] >> http://serverfault.com/questions/56691/whats-the-maximum-url-length-in-tomcat >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Tarandeep Singh, Sawhney >> <tsawh...@innodata.com> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > We are facing an issue while adding field mappings beyond 12-14 fields as >> > defined in EntityHubLinking Engine property *"Fields used for >> > dereferencing".* >> > * >> > * >> > We have created our own reference site for additional DBpedia data. But >> > when we try to map properties for dereferenced entities beyond above >> limit, >> > felix throws an error *"ajax head full" *and so we are unable to >> configure >> > all the required field mappings. >> > >> > Can you please provide some help for any workaround or point out >> something >> > that we are missing. >> > >> > best regards, >> > tarandeep >> > >> > -- >> > >> > "This e-mail and any attachments transmitted with it are for the sole use >> > of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential , proprietary >> or >> > privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please >> > contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original >> > message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, >> > forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any action taken in >> > reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful." >> >> >> >> -- >> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 >> | A-5500 Bischofshofen >> > > -- > > "This e-mail and any attachments transmitted with it are for the sole use > of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential , proprietary or > privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please > contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original > message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, > forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any action taken in > reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful." -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt
