Hi Philip, I think it is just a matter of lack of time. There are still some good ideas/refactors in the backlog (some of them discussed not too much time ago), but we probably failed to build a broader community.
My time is quite limited and others like Rupert has expressed the same recently, but I'm still wiling and looking forward to put some effort in the project. Cheers, Rafa On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 5:35 PM Phillip Rhodes <motley.crue....@gmail.com> wrote: > So, just wondering... of the folks who have worked on Stanbol up until > now, is there still interest in continuing to work on Stanbol among > that group? That is, is the lull in activity because people aren't > interested / available, or is because Stanbol is simply complete as is > and doesn't *need* any more work? > > Are there features that people have in mind for adding to a > (potential) next release? If so, can anybody call out what some of > the highest priority ones might be? I'm still interested in possibly > trying to help with some Stanbol activity, depending on what things > are needed / wanted... > > > Cheers, > > Phil > ~~~~ > This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM >
