Gotcha. I'll pore over the backlog soon and see if there's anything I might be able to take on, or at least help with.
Phil This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:04 AM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Philip, > > I think it is just a matter of lack of time. There are still some good > ideas/refactors in the backlog (some of them discussed not too much time > ago), but we probably failed to build a broader community. > > My time is quite limited and others like Rupert has expressed the same > recently, but I'm still wiling and looking forward to put some effort in > the project. > > Cheers, > Rafa > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 5:35 PM Phillip Rhodes <motley.crue....@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> So, just wondering... of the folks who have worked on Stanbol up until >> now, is there still interest in continuing to work on Stanbol among >> that group? That is, is the lull in activity because people aren't >> interested / available, or is because Stanbol is simply complete as is >> and doesn't *need* any more work? >> >> Are there features that people have in mind for adding to a >> (potential) next release? If so, can anybody call out what some of >> the highest priority ones might be? I'm still interested in possibly >> trying to help with some Stanbol activity, depending on what things >> are needed / wanted... >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Phil >> ~~~~ >> This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM >>
