>Andrew Black wrote:
>
>Greetings Martin.
>
>I haven't looked with a debugger, but my suspicion is that the new difs
>are caused by http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=644314&view=rev . I
>retrieved the results from a random build (34606522 - icl 10, Windows
>XP, 12d, 4/1, r643226), and the failures are not observed. This
>particular build occurred after
>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=643120&view=rev was checked in (my
>resolution for STDCXX-426), but before Farid's change (
>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=644314&view=rev ) was checked in.
>
>--Andrew Black
Thanks Andrew. That looks like the problem. After spending over an hour
wading through the windows build infrastructure, I finally got enough of
an idea of what was going on so that I could test the change...
The following command line
..\bin\exec -d c:\build\stdcxx\trunk\examples spell.exe radix.exe
tele.exe
Produces this output with Farid's change,
NAME STATUS WARN ASSERTS FAILED PERCNT USER SYS
REAL
spell.exe DIFF 0 0.015 0.000
0.000
radix.exe DIFF 0 0.015 0.015
0.000
tele.exe DIFF 0 0.015 0.000
0.000
And produces this after removing it and rebuilding the exec utility.
NAME STATUS WARN ASSERTS FAILED PERCNT USER SYS
REAL
spell.exe 0 0 0.015 0.000
0.000
radix.exe 0 0 0.015 0.000
0.000
tele.exe 0 0 0.015 0.000
0.000
I'll be committing a fix in a few seconds.
Travis
>
>Martin Sebor wrote:
>> Looks like all examples are being reported in the DIFF status
>> in all recent Windows builds, including a few from this morning.
>> I suspect it might have something to do with Andrew's recent
>> patch to the exec utility. Andrew, or someone with access to
>> a Windows machine, can you please look into this? It would
>> be good to get this resolved before the weekend.
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/results/
>>
>> Thanks
>> Martin
>
