Thanks for fixing it, Travis. I can't help but be a little worried
about the other "little problem on Windows" that Farid said he'd
found in STDCXX-426 and fixed by changing the "r" to "rb" I guess
we'll see tomorrow...
Martin
Travis Vitek wrote:
Andrew Black wrote:
Greetings Martin.
I haven't looked with a debugger, but my suspicion is that the new difs
are caused by http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=644314&view=rev . I
retrieved the results from a random build (34606522 - icl 10, Windows
XP, 12d, 4/1, r643226), and the failures are not observed. This
particular build occurred after
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=643120&view=rev was checked in (my
resolution for STDCXX-426), but before Farid's change (
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=644314&view=rev ) was checked in.
--Andrew Black
Thanks Andrew. That looks like the problem. After spending over an hour
wading through the windows build infrastructure, I finally got enough of
an idea of what was going on so that I could test the change...
The following command line
..\bin\exec -d c:\build\stdcxx\trunk\examples spell.exe radix.exe
tele.exe
Produces this output with Farid's change,
NAME STATUS WARN ASSERTS FAILED PERCNT USER SYS
REAL
spell.exe DIFF 0 0.015 0.000
0.000
radix.exe DIFF 0 0.015 0.015
0.000
tele.exe DIFF 0 0.015 0.000
0.000
And produces this after removing it and rebuilding the exec utility.
NAME STATUS WARN ASSERTS FAILED PERCNT USER SYS
REAL
spell.exe 0 0 0.015 0.000
0.000
radix.exe 0 0 0.015 0.000
0.000
tele.exe 0 0 0.015 0.000
0.000
I'll be committing a fix in a few seconds.
Travis
Martin Sebor wrote:
Looks like all examples are being reported in the DIFF status
in all recent Windows builds, including a few from this morning.
I suspect it might have something to do with Andrew's recent
patch to the exec utility. Andrew, or someone with access to
a Windows machine, can you please look into this? It would
be good to get this resolved before the weekend.
http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/results/
Thanks
Martin
