Farid Zaripov wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:53 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: svn commit: r650902 - /stdcxx/trunk/src/num_put.cpp
I guess I don't understand why the float overloads are all
unconditionally hardcoded:
http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/browse/stdcxx/trunk/src/num_put.cpp
?r=trunk#l184
Because I thought that is too late to implement float overloads and
check them on
every supporting platforms. Anyway _C_float case branch is not used at
the moment
(__rw_put_num() used in num_put<>::_C_put(), and _C_put() used in
num_put<>::do_put()
but there is no float overload for do_put()).
Okay, that makes me feel a little better because num_put must
already convert floats to doubles. We should probably comment
out the float branch in __rw_put_num().
So let me try to summarize the new behavior:
Solaris Windows Other
float X X X
double fmt fmt printf
long double printf fmt printf
X converted to double by iostreams
fmt formatted using __rw_fmat_infinite(double)
printf formatted using sprintf()
Did I get it right?
Btw., is there a test for this other than 22.locale.num.put?
Martin
