> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor > Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 2:51 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: svn commit: r672395 - in > /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/include: functional rw/_ref_wrap.h > ... > > 5. The definitions of even trivial non-empty functions should > never appear on the same line as the function signature. I.e., > the above should be: > > type& get() const { > _RWSTD_ASSERT (0 != _C_ptr); > return *_C_ptr; > }
I assume empty function definitions are exempted from this convention? Brad.
