> -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Lemings > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 3:42 PM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: RE: svn commit: r672395 - in > /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/include: functional rw/_ref_wrap.h > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Martin Sebor > > Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 2:51 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: svn commit: r672395 - in > > /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x/include: functional rw/_ref_wrap.h > > > ... > > > > 5. The definitions of even trivial non-empty functions should > > never appear on the same line as the function signature. I.e., > > the above should be: > > > > type& get() const { > > _RWSTD_ASSERT (0 != _C_ptr); > > return *_C_ptr; > > } > > I assume empty function definitions are exempted from this convention? >
Hey... I also see one-line trivial functions in <limits>, <set>, and <vector> headers. Brad.
